An educational design model for mixed environments and distance learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53628/emrede.v7i1.571Keywords:
educational design. EaD. Blended-Learning. Instructional Design. Teacher Training.Abstract
This article focuses on the importance of pedagogical innovation in the design of learning choreographies in mixed and distance environments. We present a pedagogical model developed with the objective of helping the teacher in the design of learning activities in mixed environments and in EaD. The 4As model: Presentation, Openness, Deepening and Appropriation, seeks to help the teacher to design student-centered online activities while also seeking to help reflect on the face-to-face component and on the different types of learning. We also seek to reflect on the role of pedagogical teacher training, namely the importance that models such as TPACK have in helping to understand the synergies, in training scenarios, that exist between technology, pedagogy, context and content. The article ends with a reflection on the pedagogical training of teachers.
Downloads
Metrics
References
ALEXANDER, B. et al. EDUCAUSE Horizon Report | 2019 Higher Education Edition. Louisville, CO: EDUCAUSE, 2019.
AREA, M.; PESSOA, T. De lo sólido a lo líquido: las nuevas alfabetizaciones ante los cambios culturales de la Web 2.0. Comunicar, v. 19, n. 38, p. 13–20, 2012.
BIGGS, J.; TANG, C. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. 4th. ed. Berkshire, England: Open University Press, 2011.
BOTTENTUIT JUNIOR, J. B.; COUTINHO, C. P. Wikis em Educação: potencialidades e contextos de utilização. 2008.
BRITAIN, S. A review of learning design: concept, specifications and tools. A report for the JISC E-learning Pedagogy Programme, v. 2006, 2004.
BURRELL, A. R. et al. Team-based curriculum design as an agent of change. Teaching in Higher Education, v. 20, n. 8, p. 753–766, 17 nov. 2015.
CASANOVA, D. Aprendizagem Potenciada pela Tecnologia no Ensino Superior: Construção de um Referencial de Qualidade. [s.l.] Universidade de Aveiro, 2014.
CASANOVA, D.; MOREIRA, A. A Model for Discussing the Quality of Technology-Enhanced Learning in Blended Learning Programmes. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL), v. 9, n. 4, p. 1–20, 2017.
CASANOVA, D.; MOREIRA, A.; COSTA, N. Technology Enhanced Learning in Higher Education: results from the design of a quality evaluation framework. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 29, p. 893–902, jan. 2011.
CASANOVA, D.; MOREIRA, A.; COSTA, N. A four levels framework to understand quality practices in active e-Learning. ECER Conference. Anais [...]. Porto: 2014. Disponível em: http://www.eera-ecer.de/ecer-programmes/conference/19/ contribution/32381/. Acesso em: 30 jan. 2020.
CASANOVA, D.; PRICE, L. Moving towards sustainable policy and practice–a five level framework for online learning sustainability. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, v. 44, n. 3, 2018.
CONOLE, G. et al. Mapping pedagogy and tools for effective learning design. Computers & Education, v. 43, n. 1, p. 17–33, 2004.
CORRÊA, G. T.; RIBEIRO, V. M. B. A formação pedagógica no ensino superior e o papel da pós-graduação stricto sensu. Educação e Pesquisa, v. 39, n. 2, p. 319–334, 2013.
DE FREITAS, S.; OLIVER, M. How can exploratory learning with games and simulations within the curriculum be most effectively evaluated? Computers & education, v. 46, n. 3, p. 249–264, 2006.
ENGLUND, C.; OLOFSSON, A. D.; PRICE, L. The influence of sociocultural and structural contexts in academic change and development in higher education. Higher Education, v. 76, n. 6, p. 1051–1069, 2018.
ESTEVES, M. Para a excelência pedagógica do ensino superior. Sisifo, n. 7, p. 101–110, 2016.
FELDER, R. M.; BRENT, R. Active Learning: an introduction. ASQ Higher Education Brief, v. 2, n. 4, 2009.
FERRAZ, A.; BELHOT, R. V. Taxonomia de Bloom: revisão teórica e apresentação das adequações do instrumento para definição de objetivos instrucionais. Gestão & Produção, v. 17, n. 2, p. 421–431, 2010.
FILATRO, A.; PICONEZ, S. Contribuições do design instrucional e do Learning Design para a organização do trabalho pedagógico. In: SÁNCHEZ, J. (Ed.). . Nuevas Ideas en Informática Educativa. Santiago de Chile, Chile: [s.n.]. p. 81–88.
HERRINGTON, J.; OLIVER, R.; REEVES, T. C. Patterns of engagement in authentic online learning environments. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, v. 19, n. 1, p. 59–71, 2003.
HMELO-SILVER, C. E. Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational psychology review, v. 16, n. 3, p. 235–266, 2004.
HUET, I. et al. Strategies to Promote Effective Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: A Portuguese Perspective. International Journal of Learning, v. 15, n. 10, 2009.
HUET, I. et al. Pedagogical traditions in EU universities: challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Intercultural Information Management, 2010.
KIM, M. C.; HANNAFIN, M. J. Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice. Computers & Education, v. 56, n. 2, p. 403–417, 2011.
KOEHLER, M. J.; MISHRA, P. What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of educational computing research, v. 32, n. 2, p. 131–152, 2005.
LAURILLARD, D. Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. 2nd. ed. London: Routledge, 2002. v. 37
LAURILLARD, D. Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. New York: Routledge, 2012.
LAURILLARD, D. et al. A constructionist learning environment for teachers to model learning designs. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, v. 29, n. 1, p. 15–30, 2013.
MESQUITA, D. et al. O contributo da formação pedagógica docente para a inovação do Ensino Superior. In: VIEIRA, F. et al. (ed.). . Inovação Pedagógica no Ensino Superior. Ideias (e) Práticas. De Facto E ed. Santo Tirso, Portugal: De Facto Editores, 2016. p. 89–96.
MOURA, A.; CARVALHO, A. A. A. Aprendizagem Colaborativa através de Mapas Conceptuais. IX Congreso Internacional Galego-Portugués de Psicopedagoxía. Anais [...]. Universidade da Coruña, 2007
NOGUEIRA, F.; PESSOA, T.; GALLEGO, M.-J. Desafios e oportunidades do uso da tecnologia para a formação continua de professores: uma revisão em torno do tpack em Portugal, Brasil e Espanha. # Tear: Revista de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia, v. 4, n. 2, 2015.
PAPERT, S. Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. [s.l.] Basic Books, Inc., 1980.
PESSOA, T. et al. Concepção e desenvolvimento de comunidades virtuais de formação de professores: o curso de b-learning de violência e gestão de conflitos na escola. In: MONTEIRO, A.; MOREIRA, J. A.; ALMEIDA, A. C. (Eds.). Educação Online: Pedagogia e Aprendizagem em Plataformas Digitais. Santo Tirso: De Facto Editores, 2012a. p. 127–144.
PESSOA, T. et al. Ensinar a Distância na Universidade de Coimbra. Cadernos de Pedagogia no ensino Superior, v. 23, p. 3–23, 2012b.
PESSOA, T.; BARREIRA, C. Dilemas e Desafios na Formação de Professores Universitários. In: NETO, A. C.; REBELO, P. V. (ed.). . O ensino superior no Brasil e em Portugal: perspectivas políticas e pedagógicas. Natal: EDUFRN, 2010. p. 101–124.
PESSOA, T.; NOGUEIRA, F. Integração das TIC na educação: políticas, prioridades e projetos em países da Europa. In: YAEGASHI, S. et al. (ed.). . Novas Tecnologias Digitais, Reflexões sobre mediação, aprendizagem e desenvolvimento. Curitiba: Editora CVR, 2017. p. 103–124.
PESSOA, T.; NOGUEIRA, F.; GALEGO, M. J. A formação inicial de professores para o uso pedagógico da tecnologia: uma revisão da literatura sobre os contributos do modelo TPACK. In: RAMOS, M. A.; HETKOWSKI, T. M.; LAGO, A. (ed.). Educação e TIC: Relatos de Experiências, Processos Formativos e Práticas Educacionais. Curitiba: Editora CRV, 2016. p. 165–192.
PIAGET, J. Piaget and His School: A Reader in Developmental Psychology. In: INHELDER, B.; CHIPMAN, H. H.; ZWINGMANN, C. (Eds.). . Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1976. p. 11–23.
PRICE, L.; CASANOVA, D.; ORWELL, S. Modeling an institutional approach to developing Technology Enabled Learning: Closing the gap between research and practice. INTED2017 Proceedings. Anais...mar. 2017
REZNITSKAYA, A. et al. Collaborative reasoning: A dialogic approach to group discussions. Cambridge journal of education, v. 39, n. 1, p. 29–48, 2009.
SALMON, G. Flying not flapping: a strategic framework for e-learning and pedagogical innovation in higher education institutions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, v. 13, n. 3, p. 201–218, set. 2005.
SHULMAN, L. S. Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, v. 15, n. 2, p. 4–14, 1986.
VALENTE, J. A. Blended learning e as mudanças no ensino superior: a proposta da sala de aula invertida. Educar em Revista, n. 4, p. 79–97, 2014.
VAN DER SLUIS, H.; BURDEN, P.; HUET, I. Retrospection and reflection: The emerging influence of an institutional professional recognition scheme on professional development and academic practice in a UK university. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, v. 54, n. 2, p. 126–134, mar. 2017.
VAZ-REBELO, P.; PESSOA, T.; BARREIRA, C. Ser Professor Universitário: estudo exploratório em torno de concepções e de práticas. Revista Portuguesa de pedagogia, p. 63–82, 2010.
VYGOTSKY, L. S. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard university press, 1980.
WALIÑO-GUERRERO, M. J. et al. Aplicaciones TIC para la gestión del aprendizaje. Llibre d’Actes II Jornades Tecnologies de la desregulació dels continguts curriculars. Anais[...]. Valencia, Es: 2017
WILLIAMS, K.; KEAR, K.; ROSEWELL, J. Quality Assessment for e-Learning: a Benchmark Approach. Heerlen: Europeean Association of Distance Teaching Universities (EADTU), 2012.
YOUNG, C.; PEROVIĆ, N. Rapid and creative course design: as easy as ABC? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 228, p. 390–395, 2016.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Diogo Casanova, Maria Teresa Pessoa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
By submitting an article to EmRede Journal and having it approved, the authors agree to transfer, without remuneration, the following rights to EmRede: the rights of first publication and the permission for EmRede to redistribute this article and its metadata to indexing and reference that its editors deem appropriate. By virtue of appearing in this public access magazine, the articles are free to use by the authors, with attributions that allow distribution, remix, adaptation and creation based on your work, even for commercial purposes, as long as due credit is given for the original creation to EmRede Journal.
Creative Commons License - Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY).